Advertisement
What really powers the cloud? Behind every Google search, A...
A lot of what defines a home isn’t visible at handover. I...
Private equity has played a significant role in shaping Indi...
Luxury real estate is one of the most talked-about segments ...
Airports play a much bigger role than just enabling travel -...
The Haryana government has restored the suspension on approvals for stilt-plus-four (S+4) residential buildings while proceedings on the matter continue before the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The Town and Country Planning Department has instructed field offices to stop granting fresh permissions until further directions are issued. The decision is intended to ensure that building approvals remain aligned with the ongoing judicial process and the state's regulatory review of the S+4 housing policy.
The Haryana government has reinstated the suspension on granting approvals for stilt-plus-four (S+4) residential buildings, directing planning authorities to halt the processing of fresh applications until further notice. The decision has been taken in view of the ongoing proceedings before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, where issues relating to the implementation of the S+4 policy continue to be examined. The latest direction requires officials to withhold approvals pending further instructions from the government and the outcome of the judicial process.
The Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP) has communicated the revised position to its field offices, asking them to discontinue the issuance of fresh building permissions under the S+4 framework. The move effectively restores the restrictions that had earlier been imposed on such developments and reflects the government's decision to maintain the status quo while legal questions surrounding the policy remain under consideration.
The policy governing stilt-plus-four construction has been the subject of extensive discussion in Haryana over the past few years because of its implications for urban infrastructure, residential density and civic amenities. While the model was introduced to increase housing availability on residential plots, concerns were subsequently raised regarding its impact on traffic movement, parking availability, water supply, sewerage systems and other municipal infrastructure in rapidly developing urban areas.
The High Court proceedings have prompted the state to periodically review its regulatory approach towards S+4 developments. Rather than permitting fresh approvals while the matter remains under judicial scrutiny, the government has chosen to suspend the approval process until legal clarity emerges. The latest administrative direction is intended to ensure that planning decisions remain consistent with the issues being examined before the court and avoid complications arising from approvals granted during the pendency of the proceedings.
The suspension applies to fresh permissions processed by the planning department and its field offices. Existing developments and approvals already granted remain subject to the applicable legal and regulatory framework, while any future decisions regarding the policy are expected to depend on the outcome of the court proceedings and subsequent government review. The authorities are also likely to reassess the operational aspects of the policy in light of urban planning considerations and infrastructure capacity.
The issue has drawn considerable attention from homeowners, developers and urban planners, particularly in cities witnessing rapid residential growth. Stilt-plus-four developments have been viewed as a means of increasing housing supply on individual residential plots, but they have also generated debate over whether existing civic infrastructure is equipped to support higher residential densities without corresponding upgrades to public utilities and transport networks.
For the present, the Haryana government has opted to maintain a cautious regulatory approach by withholding fresh approvals until the judicial process progresses further. The decision underscores the administration's intention to align urban development approvals with legal requirements while broader policy questions concerning high-density residential construction continue to be examined.
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
