Advertisement
What really powers the cloud? Behind every Google search, A...
A lot of what defines a home isn’t visible at handover. I...
Private equity has played a significant role in shaping Indi...
Luxury real estate is one of the most talked-about segments ...
Airports play a much bigger role than just enabling travel -...
Embassy Group has challenged a writ petition linked to allegations surrounding certain transactions, describing the filing as a repetition of issues that have already been examined by regulators and judicial forums. The company stated that the matter remains under review by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and maintained that previous proceedings had addressed similar claims. The development has drawn attention across the real estate and infrastructure sectors, given Embassy’s significant presence in commercial property, business parks and infrastructure-linked assets.
Embassy Group has contested a writ petition questioning the “fit and proper” status of certain entities and promoters linked to Embassy Office Parks REIT, while the Bombay High Court has directed the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to examine representations submitted by the petitioner within six weeks. The matter came up before the court in the past week and concerns regulatory eligibility and governance-related issues under the framework governing real estate investment trusts (REITs).
The petition was filed by Chayan Upadhyay, who sought regulatory scrutiny of entities and promoters associated with Embassy Office Parks REIT. During proceedings, the Bombay High Court directed SEBI to consider the representations made by the petitioner and provide an appropriate response within the stipulated period. The matter is scheduled to be heard again later this month.
Following the hearing, Embassy Group issued a statement rejecting the allegations and characterising the petition as a repetition of claims that had previously been raised before various judicial and regulatory forums. The company stated that the proceedings formed part of what it described as a continuing campaign against the group and its promoters. According to Embassy, similar challenges involving Embassy-linked businesses had been examined in earlier cases and had not resulted in adverse findings against the group.
The company further maintained that multiple proceedings connected with Embassy entities had either been dismissed, withdrawn or rejected by courts in the past. Embassy argued that the present petition sought to revive issues that had already been addressed through earlier legal processes. It also pointed to amendments made to the SEBI REIT Regulations relating to the “fit and proper” framework, contending that the regulatory landscape had evolved since some of the earlier allegations were first raised.
The case has attracted attention within the real estate and capital markets sectors because Embassy Office Parks REIT remains one of India’s largest listed office real estate investment trusts. REITs operate under a regulatory framework overseen by SEBI and are required to comply with governance, disclosure and eligibility standards applicable to sponsors, promoters and related entities.
The High Court’s order does not determine the merits of the allegations but requires SEBI to examine the representations submitted by the petitioner and take an appropriate view in accordance with regulatory provisions. The regulator’s assessment is expected to focus on the issues raised in the representations and the applicable provisions under existing REIT regulations.
For Embassy Group, the proceedings represent the latest in a series of legal and regulatory matters involving entities associated with the group. The company has maintained that the allegations lack merit and has reiterated that previous judicial proceedings have not supported similar claims. The outcome of SEBI’s review will determine the next stage of the matter as it returns to the Bombay High Court for further consideration.
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
