SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

Rajasthan High Court presses state to enforce sealing order on illegal commercial activities in Jaipur's Walled City

#Law & Policy#India#Rajasthan
Synopsis

Rajasthan High Court has directed the state government to submit a detailed compliance report by early July concerning 19 buildings in Jaipur's historic Walled City found operating commercial establishments illegally in residential zones. This development follows a petition by the building owners seeking relief. The court was informed that only some owners had been heard so far, with others yet to present their stance. The amicus curiae highlighted that a three-month extension for compliance was excessive, while a senior advocate stressed the urgency of swift enforcement, particularly after the Supreme Court dismissed the owners' Special Leave Petition. This legal proceeding reflects ongoing challenges in balancing heritage conservation with urban commercial activities.

The Rajasthan High Court recently instructed the state government to provide a comprehensive compliance report by early July regarding 19 buildings within Jaipur's Walled City that were found to be operating commercial businesses in areas designated for residential use. The court's directive came during proceedings linked to a petition filed by the owners of these buildings seeking relief from previous orders.


During the hearing, Assistant Advocate General GS Gill informed the court that out of the 19 building owners, only 10 had been heard so far, with the remaining nine yet to present their responses. He sought an extension of three months for the government to fully comply with the court's earlier order, which had mandated the sealing of these illegal commercial establishments.

However, the amicus curiae, Shobhit Tiwari, argued that a three-month timeframe was excessive and urged the court to demand swifter action. He emphasised that the issue required prompt resolution to uphold the sanctity of the heritage zone.

Representing the affected parties, senior advocate Vimal Chaudhary highlighted that the building owners had not been forthcoming with the court about the rejection of their Special Leave Petition by the Supreme Court. He called for immediate enforcement of the sealing order, stressing that any delay would undermine the judicial process and exacerbate violations.

The High Court had originally issued the sealing order in late February, addressing concerns raised by local residents and heritage authorities about the proliferation of unauthorised commercial activities within the protected residential precincts of Jaipur's historic Walled City. This area, recognised for its architectural and cultural significance, has long been subject to strict zoning regulations designed to preserve its character.

The ongoing legal proceedings underscore the persistent tension between urban commercial development and heritage conservation in rapidly growing cities like Jaipur. While economic activities are vital, maintaining the integrity of protected zones remains a priority for the judiciary and civic authorities alike.

Discussion

Have something to say? Post your comment