SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

Affordable Housing: Haryana forms panel to investigate irregularities in Sohna e-draw

#Law & Policy#India#Haryana
Synopsis

The Haryana government has formed a four-member committee to investigate irregularities in the e-draw process for affordable housing in Sector 36, Sohna. Concerns arose after all 708 flats were awarded exclusively to Sohna residents, contradicting the Affordable Housing Policy of 2013. The government has paused allotments while the committee, including senior town planning officials, examines potential technical errors, administrative oversight, or bias. The Department of Town and Country Planning has ordered a fresh draw. As scrutiny of the e-draw system continues, the committee's findings will determine corrective measures to ensure a fair and transparent housing allocation process.

The Haryana government has established a four-member committee to look into the recent e-draw process used for the allocation of affordable housing units in Sector 36, Sohna. This decision follows the results of a draw held on January 27, where all 708 available flats were awarded to residents of Sohna, raising suspicions about the fairness of the process. The government has temporarily halted all allotments pending the committee's investigation, which is expected to conclude within ten days.


The controversy stems from the Affordable Housing Policy of 2013, which aims to ensure fair distribution of housing across various demographics. According to reports, out of 51,586 applicants, only those from Sohna received flats, contradicting the policy's intention of inclusivity. The committee, which includes senior officials from the town planning department, will assess whether the issue arose from a technical error in the e-draw system or if there was an administrative oversight. Additionally, they will investigate the possibility of any intentional bias in the allocation process.

The e-draw was part of a project developed by 4S Developers, licensed under number 235 of 2023. The senior town planner for Gurgaon raised concerns about the allocation results, prompting the Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP) to issue orders for a fresh draw in accordance with policy guidelines. The scrutiny of the e-draw software is also underway to ensure compliance with eligibility criteria that apply across the state.

This situation has sparked significant debate with many applicants voicing their frustrations and doubts about the integrity of the system. The committee's findings will be crucial in determining the next steps for the affected applicants. As the investigation unfolds, residents and stakeholders are closely watching to see if the government will implement necessary changes to restore confidence in the allocation process.

Discussion

Have something to say? Post your comment