Advertisement
Private equity has played a significant role in shaping Indi...
In today’s real estate landscape, fitness is often treated...
In this episode of Prop Personalities, we sit down with Hars...
Luxury real estate is one of the most talked-about segments ...
Welcome to Prop Personalities by Prop News Time - a podcast ...
• The Bombay High Court has dismissed an application filed by 52 tenants seeking to add a new developer to an ongoing redevelopment dispute involving Kamla Bhuvan in Ghatkopar West, Mumbai.
• The court also imposed costs of INR 5 lakh on the tenants, observing that the application appeared to be an attempt to pressure landlords through litigation despite the absence of a contractual agreement with the proposed developer.
• The redevelopment matter relates to a dilapidated building on LBS Marg that was demolished in 2018 after being declared unsafe.
• The tenants had argued that prolonged delays in the project and concerns over permanent rehabilitation prompted their request to include the new developer, BS Lifespace, in the proceedings.
• The ruling comes amid broader concerns over delays in Mumbai’s cessed building redevelopment projects, transit housing shortages, and prolonged legal disputes affecting redevelopment execution across the city.
The Bombay High Court has rejected a plea filed by 52 tenants seeking the inclusion of a new developer in an ongoing redevelopment dispute concerning Kamla Bhuvan, a demolished residential building located in Ghatkopar West, Mumbai. Advertisement
In its recent order, the division bench comprising Justices Ajey Gadkari and Kamal Khata dismissed the interim application and imposed costs of INR 5 lakh on the tenants. The court observed that the plea appeared to have been moved to create pressure on the landlords and original developer despite the absence of any enforceable contractual arrangement between the landlords and the proposed developer, BS Lifespace.
The dispute relates to Kamla Bhuvan, a dilapidated structure situated on LBS Marg in Ghatkopar West, which was demolished by the municipal authorities in 2018 after being declared unsafe. In 2024, the tenants had approached the court seeking directions for expediting the stalled redevelopment process. Subsequently, during the pendency of the matter, they filed an interim application seeking to implead BS Lifespace as a party to the proceedings.
According to submissions made before the court, the tenants expressed concern regarding delays in redevelopment and apprehensions that the landlords may fail to provide permanent alternate accommodation or fulfil rehabilitation commitments. The tenants’ counsel argued that the proposed developer had been substantially involved in redevelopment-related discussions and had been introduced by the landlords during the process.
However, counsel representing the landlords opposed the application, stating that no contractual agreement existed with the proposed developer and that the original developer continued to remain associated with the project. The landlords further argued that the tenants were attempting to use judicial proceedings to compel the landlords into entering a commercial arrangement with the new developer.
The court held that the tenants had no legal basis to seek the inclusion of a developer with whom the landlords shared no contractual relationship. The bench observed that adding the proposed party would unnecessarily widen the scope of the dispute and complicate the redevelopment proceedings. The judges also remarked that the application amounted to misuse of the legal process and described it as a backdoor attempt to create enforceable rights for the proposed developer.
The court offered the applicants an opportunity to withdraw the plea, but the tenants sought a judicial determination on merits. Following dismissal of the application, the court directed that the imposed costs be paid to the Advocate Academy and Research Centre operated by the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa within two weeks.
The ruling comes at a time when redevelopment of Mumbai’s ageing and cessed buildings continues to face delays arising from litigation, title disputes, rehabilitation challenges, and shortage of transit accommodation. A recent court-appointed panel report highlighted that nearly four lakh residents continue to live in over 12,500 ageing cessed buildings across Mumbai, many of them awaiting redevelopment or structural intervention.
5th Jun, 2025
25th May, 2023
11th May, 2023
27th Apr, 2023
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
