SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

Bombay High Court allows additional floors in residential building despite protests

#Law & Policy#India#Jammu and Kashmir#Mumbai City
PNT Reporter | Last Updated : 9th May, 2023
Synopsis

Despite protests from the housing society, the Bombay High Court approved the construction of nine additional floors by a developer in a 12-story building. The organization had contended that due to CRZ limits, the original project to build 38 levels had been reduced to 12 floors, and that additional construction would endanger the existing building. However, the developer relied on a VJTI report that authorized the extra floors. Until the petitioners file a substantive lawsuit, the developer will continue construction at their own risk, according to the division bench of justices Gautam Patel and Neela Gokhale.

The Bombay High Court has permitted a developer, Dattani Shelter Cooperative Housing Society, to construct an additional nine floors in a 12-storey building, despite objections raised by the housing society. The society had initially restricted the construction to only 12 floors from the planned 38 floors due to coastal regulation zone (CRZ) restrictions. The housing society argued that the additional floors would pose a risk to the existing structure. However, the developer argued that a report by VJTI gave the green light for the construction of additional floors.




The division bench of Justice Gautam Patel and Justice Neela Gokhale heard the petition filed by the Dattani Shelter Cooperative Housing Society. After considering the submissions from both parties, the bench granted liberty to the housing society to file proceedings against the developer before a competent civil court and obtain necessary interim orders within seven weeks; failing to do so would mean no hindrance for the developer to continue the construction. However, the bench noted that if the respondents continued the construction beyond that day, they would be doing so at their risk and without claiming equities until such time as the petitioners filed a substantive suit.



The ruling has sparked concerns among environmentalists and citizens, who fear that such construction could lead to ecological damage and endanger the safety of residents. The issue of illegal construction has been a persistent problem in Mumbai, with many developers flouting CRZ norms and other regulations. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has been cracking down on illegal constructions and demolishing unauthorized structures.



Mumbai has witnessed a surge in real estate development, with many high-rise buildings dotting the city's skyline. However, this development has come at a cost, with many residents complaining about the lack of infrastructure and civic amenities. The city has also witnessed instances of delayed projects, substandard quality, and other issues related to the real estate sector.



The controversy over the Dattani Shelter Cooperative Housing Society's construction project highlights the need for a balanced approach to development that takes into account environmental concerns and public safety. It also underscores the importance of strict enforcement of regulations and transparency in the real estate sector. As Mumbai continues to grow and expand, it is crucial to ensure that development is sustainable and equitable, and that the interests of all stakeholders are safeguarded.

Have something to say? Post your comment