India >> Maharashtra >> Mumbai

BMC files notice against a private developer no non-compliance with air pollution norms

Synopsis

On Monday, the BMC's K-West ward filed an FIR against a private developer for non-compliance with air pollution mitigation measures at a construction site in Vile Parle (West). Despite receiving guidelines and a subsequent stop-work notice, the developer allegedly failed to implement a 25-ft tall sheet fencing around the site. The FIR, filed under IPC Section 291, reflects the BMC's strict approach to enforcing environmental regulations. The formation of specialized squads and the legal action underscore the municipality's commitment to monitoring and ensuring compliance with air pollution guidelines in construction projects, setting a precedent for developers to adhere to mandated measures.

10 sec backward button
play pause button
10 sec forward button
0:00
0:00

On Monday, the K-West ward of the BMC took legal action against a private developer by filing a First Information Report (FIR) for non-compliance with air pollution mitigation measures. The ward established six squads, and the one assigned to the Santacruz police station region served air pollution mitigation guidelines to the developer’s site in Vile Parle (West) on November 8. Despite a stop-work notice issued on November 9 and a subsequent complaint on November 19, work was observed at the site during a visit by a "nuisance detector," leading to the registration of an FIR. A civic officer revealed that the developer failed to implement the required 25-ft tall sheet fencing around the site, a violation that prompted the FIR. The charges levied against the developer fall under Indian Penal Code Section 291, specifically addressing the continuance of nuisance after an injunction to discontinue. The FIR signifies a stringent approach by the BMC's K-West ward in enforcing environmental regulations at construction sites. The formation of specialized squads demonstrates a proactive stance in monitoring and ensuring compliance with air pollution guidelines. The case against Bharat Developer serves as a clear example of the consequences faced by developers who neglect to implement mandated measures to mitigate air pollution during construction activities. The timeline of events, from the issuance of guidelines to the filing of the FIR, highlights the systematic approach taken by the civic authorities in addressing violations. The involvement of law enforcement, as evidenced by the FIR, underscores the seriousness with which the BMC is treating instances of non-compliance, signalling a commitment to maintaining environmental standards in construction projects. Moving forward, this case is likely to serve as a precedent, influencing other developers to strictly adhere to air pollution mitigation measures to avoid legal repercussions. The emphasis on implementing a 25-ft tall sheet as a protective measure underscores the BMC's focus on structural and environmental considerations in construction practices. Overall, the BMC's decisive action in this case reflects a proactive stance in safeguarding environmental well-being and ensuring that construction activities align with prescribed guidelines.

Have something to say? Post your comment

Recent Messages

Advertisement