Advertisement
What really powers the cloud? Behind every Google search, A...
A lot of what defines a home isn’t visible at handover. I...
Private equity has played a significant role in shaping Indi...
Luxury real estate is one of the most talked-about segments ...
Airports play a much bigger role than just enabling travel -...
• The Calcutta High Court has ruled that buyers cannot seek regularisation of unauthorised constructions merely because they have invested money in such properties.
• The court observed that financial investment does not create a legal right to legitimise structures built in violation of sanctioned plans and building regulations.
• The judgment reiterated the responsibility of buyers to conduct due diligence before purchasing property and verify statutory approvals.
• The court stressed that permitting regularisation on sympathetic grounds would weaken urban planning laws and encourage further violations.
• The ruling comes amid continuing judicial scrutiny of illegal construction and municipal enforcement across West Bengal.
The Calcutta High Court has held that purchasers of flats or properties constructed without proper authorisation cannot seek regularisation of such structures solely on the basis that they have invested money in them. The court observed that financial investment in a property does not confer any legal entitlement to validate or protect constructions that violate sanctioned building plans and statutory regulations. Advertisement
In its observations, the court emphasised that allowing unauthorised constructions to be regularised merely because buyers have purchased units in such developments would undermine the enforcement of municipal laws and planned urban development. The bench noted that illegal structures cannot acquire legitimacy through subsequent transactions or financial hardship claimed by purchasers.
The ruling reinforces a consistent judicial position adopted by higher courts in matters involving unauthorised development. The court stressed that compliance with sanctioned plans, zoning regulations and building rules remains mandatory, irrespective of the investments made by purchasers or the stage of occupancy of the property. According to the observations, sympathy towards buyers cannot become a basis for overlooking statutory violations committed during construction.
The High Court further observed that prospective buyers are expected to undertake due diligence before purchasing residential or commercial property. This includes verifying sanctioned plans, municipal approvals and the legal status of the development. The court indicated that purchasers cannot subsequently claim protection from enforcement action if they fail to examine whether a project complies with applicable regulations.
The judgment comes against the backdrop of increasing judicial scrutiny of illegal and unauthorised constructions across several urban centres. Courts have repeatedly expressed concerns regarding violations of approved building plans, unauthorised floor additions and deviations from municipal regulations, particularly in densely populated urban areas where such developments place additional pressure on civic infrastructure and public services.
The bench also highlighted the broader implications of unauthorised construction on urban planning and public safety. Judicial observations in similar matters have noted that illegal developments can affect access to utilities, road infrastructure, drainage systems, fire safety compliance and environmental management, creating long-term challenges for municipal authorities and residents.
The ruling aligns with a series of recent court decisions that have adopted a strict approach towards building violations and unauthorised development. Courts have increasingly emphasised that regularisation should remain an exceptional measure rather than a routine mechanism for legitimising illegal construction. The latest judgment reiterates that enforcement of planning laws and sanctioned development norms must take precedence over financial considerations arising from property transactions.
The decision is expected to have implications for developers, property buyers and municipal authorities, particularly in cases involving disputed approvals, deviations from sanctioned plans and ongoing enforcement proceedings against unauthorised structures. The judgment further reinforces the principle that compliance with statutory building regulations remains central to property ownership and development rights.
5th Jun, 2025
25th May, 2023
11th May, 2023
27th Apr, 2023
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
