SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

DOJ pushes to dismiss lawsuit over White House ballroom, cites security concerns after shooting incident

#International News#United States of America
Last Updated : 2nd May, 2026
Synopsis

The U.S. Justice Department has asked a federal court to dismiss a lawsuit blocking plans for a White House ballroom, linking the need for the project to a recent shooting incident at a Washington event attended by President Donald Trump. The case, filed by a preservation group, argues that the construction lacks congressional approval. While a district court had earlier halted parts of the project, an appeals court allowed work to continue. The matter has drawn attention due to both its legal implications and the tone of the government’s court filing.

The U.S. Justice Department has moved a federal court to dismiss a lawsuit that has slowed down plans to build a ballroom at the White House, stating that recent security concerns highlight the importance of the project.


In a court submission made earlier this week, officials referred to a recent attempted shooting at a Washington event attended by Donald Trump, arguing that such incidents underline the need for a secure and controlled indoor venue within the White House complex. The filing suggested that the proposed ballroom would be among the safest and most secure structures of its kind.

The department also claimed that the legal challenge was politically motivated and lacked merit. It argued that opposition to the project was influenced by bias against Trump, and indirectly criticised those backing the lawsuit. The filing further highlighted Trump’s background in real estate, stating indirectly that his experience and capability set him apart from previous presidents in executing such a project.

The lawsuit was filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which has questioned the legality of the construction. The group has maintained that the ballroom cannot be built without approval from the U.S. Congress.

Earlier in the past week, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had agreed with the preservation group’s argument and issued an order stopping above-ground construction. However, that order was temporarily paused by an appeals court, allowing work on the project to continue for now.

The Justice Department’s filing has also drawn criticism from legal experts, particularly over its language and tone. Some noted that the wording appeared informal and resembled the style often used by Trump in public communications. A legal expert from the Cato Institute remarked that such language was not appropriate for official court documents, regardless of the client involved.

Meanwhile, the preservation group has confirmed that it will continue to pursue the case. Its leadership stated that the lawsuit is aimed at ensuring that the administration follows legal procedures and does not pose any risk to public safety.

In a related development, the individual accused in the shooting incident at the Washington event has been formally charged with attempting to assassinate the U.S. president. If convicted, the accused could face life imprisonment.

The proposal for a White House ballroom has been discussed for years, with past administrations considering similar ideas but not moving forward due to cost, heritage concerns, and regulatory requirements. The current plan has revived debate around balancing security needs with preservation of historic government properties.

Source Reuters

Have something to say? Post your comment