Advertisement
Private equity has played a significant role in shaping Indi...
In today’s real estate landscape, fitness is often treated...
In this episode of Prop Personalities, we sit down with Hars...
Luxury real estate is one of the most talked-about segments ...
Welcome to Prop Personalities by Prop News Time - a podcast ...
A district consumer court in Raipur has ruled that shopping malls cannot charge visitors for parking, terming the practice an unfair trade under consumer protection laws. The order, issued recently, directed a mall to stop levying parking fees and awarded compensation to the complainant. The ruling was based on the principle that parking is a mandatory component of commercial building approvals and forms part of the services offered to customers. The decision, supported by earlier judicial precedents, may influence similar disputes across cities, particularly as mall operators increasingly monetise ancillary services amid rising operating costs.
A district consumer disputes redressal commission in Raipur has ruled that shopping malls cannot levy parking charges on visitors, holding that such fees constitute an unfair trade practice under consumer protection regulations. Advertisement
The order, issued recently, came in response to a complaint filed by a consumer who was charged a parking fee at a mall despite not intending to use the facility beyond a brief stop. The commission directed the mall to discontinue the collection of parking fees and awarded compensation to the complainant for mental distress, along with litigation costs.
In its findings, the commission observed that parking facilities are an integral requirement under building approval norms for commercial establishments. It noted that malls are obligated to provide adequate parking as part of their approved infrastructure and cannot monetise this facility separately from the services offered to consumers.
The mall’s defence that parking operations had been outsourced to a third-party contractor was rejected, with the commission stating that responsibility for ensuring fair trade practices rests with the property owner or operator. The ruling highlighted that contractual arrangements with external agencies do not absolve mall management of accountability towards consumers.
The commission further pointed to established legal precedents, indicating that parking spaces form a mandatory component of commercial developments and are typically excluded from revenue-generating areas under building regulations. On this basis, charging separate fees was deemed inconsistent with the intended use of such infrastructure.
The judgment also underscored that front-facing consumer services within a mall ecosystem—such as parking—are intrinsically linked to the overall retail experience and cannot be treated as standalone commercial offerings. As malls derive revenue through leasing and maintenance charges from tenants, imposing additional costs on visitors was viewed as lacking legal justification.
The ruling comes amid ongoing debates across Indian cities regarding the legality of parking charges in commercial complexes. While some judicial interventions have supported free parking as part of statutory obligations, others have allowed limited fee structures under specific conditions, reflecting a lack of uniformity in regulatory interpretation.
Industry observers note that the decision could have wider implications for mall operators, particularly in high-density urban markets where parking management is often outsourced and treated as a separate revenue stream. If upheld in higher forums or replicated in other jurisdictions, the ruling may require operators to reassess their operating models and compliance frameworks.
The order reinforces the role of consumer courts in addressing ancillary charges within real estate-linked services, particularly where such charges intersect with statutory provisions governing commercial developments.
5th Jun, 2025
25th May, 2023
11th May, 2023
27th Apr, 2023
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
