Advertisement
When should a housing society in Mumbai start considering re...
From GST on JDAs to SEBI’s REIT reclassification and the S...
Stay ahead in the world of real estate with our daily podcas...
Stay ahead in the world of real estate with our daily podcas...
Jaipur's Master Plan 2047 has come under criticism from urban planning experts over key structural gaps. Concerns include a sharp expansion of the city's planned area, low population density assumptions, and deviation from central planning guidelines. Experts have warned that including large rural areas without matching infrastructure could strain civic services and lead to inefficient development. The Rajasthan High Court has also stayed parts of the plan, indicating the need for review. These issues have raised concerns about the plan's practicality and long-term implementation.
Jaipur's Master Plan 2047 has drawn criticism from urban planning experts, who have highlighted several concerns related to its scale, planning approach, and implementation feasibility. The plan is intended to guide the city's long-term development, but experts believe certain assumptions and proposals may create challenges if not revised. Advertisement
One of the main concerns is the proposed expansion of the Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) area to nearly 6,500 sq km, with around 3,500 sq km identified as urbanisable. Experts have pointed out that this is significantly higher than what is generally recommended under national urban planning norms. Such a large expansion could make planning, monitoring, and infrastructure delivery more difficult to manage.
Population density projections under the plan have also been questioned. The proposed density is about 23 persons per hectare, which is much lower than the recommended level of around 175 persons per hectare for a city like Jaipur. This suggests that large rural and low-density areas are being brought into the urban framework, which may not be efficient from a planning or service delivery perspective.
Experts have indicated that such low-density planning can lead to urban sprawl, where development spreads across large areas without adequate infrastructure support. In several peripheral locations around Jaipur, residents are already facing issues related to roads, drainage, and basic services. Expanding the urban area further without parallel infrastructure development may increase these gaps.
Another issue raised is the integration of rural and urban areas under a single planning structure without clear administrative support. Jaipur currently does not have a fully developed multi-level governance system like some other large cities, which could make it difficult to manage such a wide and diverse planning area effectively.
There are also concerns that the draft plan does not fully align with the Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation (URDPFI) guidelines. Experts have noted that deviations from these guidelines may affect the scientific and structured approach required for long-term urban planning.
The concerns have gained more attention after the Rajasthan High Court put a stay on certain aspects of the plan's expansion. This indicates that parts of the proposal may need further review and adjustments before implementation. Experts have also pointed out the lack of clarity on phased development and execution timelines, which are important for managing large-scale urban growth.
While the plan aims to accommodate future growth and expansion, experts believe that a more balanced approach, with realistic density levels and infrastructure planning, would make it more practical and easier to implement.
5th Jun, 2025
25th May, 2023
11th May, 2023
27th Apr, 2023
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
