SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

H-RERA orders Chintels Paradiso builder to refund INR 1.7 cr with interest to homebuyer

#Law & Policy#Residential#India#Haryana
Last Updated : 7th Dec, 2025
Synopsis

H-RERA has ruled in favour of a homebuyer who booked a flat in Chintels Paradiso, Sector 109, Gurugram, where part of the project collapsed in February 2022 and the unit in Tower H was never delivered. The buyer, who filed a complaint in 2023, will receive a refund of about INR 1.705 crore with 10.85% annual interest from the valuation date until payment. The authority also awarded INR 2 lakh for mental distress and INR 50,000 in litigation costs. The order emphasises that when a project becomes unsafe and possession is not granted, developers remain liable under RERA, ensuring meaningful restitution for affected homebuyers.

H-RERA recently passed a ruling in favour of a complainant who had booked a flat in Chintels Paradiso, located in Sector 109, Gurugram. The flat in Tower H was never handed over, and the project suffered a partial collapse in February 2022. The buyer filed a complaint with the authority in 2023, seeking a full refund of amounts paid under the payment plan, along with appropriate interest and compensation.


The authority found merit in the complaint, determining that the buyer was entitled to a refund. It directed that the builder repay approximately INR 1.705 crore (as assessed by a statutory valuation committee), along with interest at the rate of 10.85 per cent per annum - calculated from the valuation date until actual realisation of the refund. In addition, the buyer was awarded INR 2 lakh for mental anguish caused by the unresolved housing issue and INR 50,000 to cover litigation costs.

The order underlines that when a residential project becomes unsafe for habitation and possession has not been granted, the developer's obligations towards the buyer are enforceable under the real-estate regulatory framework. It further reinforces that regulatory oversight can ensure restitution for aggrieved homebuyers, even years after project abnormalities emerge.

Have something to say? Post your comment