SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

Rajasthan High Court halts sealing of 19 commercial complexes in Jaipur's Walled City

#Law & Policy#India#Rajasthan
Last Updated : 14th Mar, 2025
Synopsis

The Rajasthan High Court has issued a status quo order, temporarily halting the sealing of 19 commercial complexes in Jaipur's Walled City after the Jaipur Municipal Corporation - Heritage (JMC-H) ordered their closure for alleged illegal commercial activity in a UNESCO World Heritage site. The case, dating back to 2019, centers on concerns that businesses are damaging historic structures. However, shop owners argue they were not given a fair hearing. The ruling reflects broader challenges in heritage conservation vs. economic growth, as seen in Delhi's Chandni Chowk and Mumbai's Colaba, where similar disputes continue.

The Rajasthan High Court recently issued a status quo order on the sealing of 19 commercial complexes in the Walled City of Jaipur, effectively halting any immediate action following a sealing order from the Jaipur Municipal Corporation - Heritage (JMC-H). The court's decision, passed by a division bench of Chief Justice MM Shrivastave and Justice Bhuvan Goyal, came in response to an application filed by the operators of these commercial complexes. The case centers around allegations of illegal commercial activity in historically significant buildings in the Walled City, which is a designated heritage zone.


The dispute dates back to 2019, when a committee was set up by the court to review the legality of operations in buildings situated in and around Haldiyon ki Rasta, a prominent area in the Walled City. The committee's findings suggested that many of the 19 buildings were being used for business purposes, which contravened the heritage protection rules of the area. It was further claimed that these commercial activities were causing damage to the heritage fabric of the Walled City, a UNESCO World Heritage site. In light of these findings, the court initially ordered the sealing of these complexes.

The operators of the commercial complexes, however, argued that the committee had not given them a fair hearing or considered their documents, which they claimed proved the legality of their operations. Senior counsel Madhav Mitra, representing nine of the petitioners, contended that the committee had failed to consider the representations of the occupiers and had not allowed them a chance to defend their businesses. They asserted that the actions taken by the authorities were unjust and disproportionate.

In response, the Rajasthan High Court decided to maintain the status quo, halting the sealing process until further deliberation. This ruling gives the petitioners some temporary relief, as the commercial complexes will remain operational until the court further reviews the case.

This case highlights the ongoing tension between urban development and heritage conservation in Jaipur, a city that is known for its rich history and cultural heritage. Jaipur's Walled City, with its intricate architecture and historical significance, is at the heart of a broader debate regarding the balance between preserving the past and enabling modern economic activities.

Other cities with similar heritage conservation challenges, such as Mumbai and Delhi, have faced comparable issues. In Delhi's Chandni Chowk area, for example, the Delhi High Court has also dealt with the question of commercial activity in heritage zones, leading to discussions about how to allow businesses to thrive without compromising the city's historic integrity. In Mumbai, the development of the Colaba area has raised concerns regarding high-rise buildings encroaching on historical landmarks. These examples show that Jaipur is not alone in navigating the complex issue of balancing heritage protection with urban and economic growth.

As the case continues, the court's decision will have significant implications for the future of heritage conservation in Jaipur, particularly for the commercial viability of businesses located within the city's historical precincts.

Have something to say? Post your comment