SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

Lucknow: LDA orders removal of unauthorised structures in 81 Lucknow apartments

#Law & Policy#India#Uttar Pradesh#Lucknow
Last Updated : 5th Feb, 2025
Synopsis

The Lucknow Development Authority (LDA) has issued final notices to owners of 81 apartments, instructing them to remove unauthorised structures within 15 days. Originally, a demolition order was passed in 2009 under the Uttar Pradesh Town Planning and Development Act, but it was never enforced. A PIL filed in 2012 brought the issue back into focus, and a recent High Court ruling has now directed authorities to act. Advocate Prince Lenin highlighted the court's firm stance, while LDA Secretary Vivek Srivastava stated that failure to comply would lead to demolition at the owners' expense.

The Lucknow Development Authority (LDA) has issued notices to 81 apartment owners, directing them to remove unauthorised portions of their buildings within 15 days. If they fail to comply, the authority will move ahead with demolition at their expense. This decision is part of an intensified effort to curb illegal constructions in the city.


According to the notices, the demolition order was originally passed on March 31, 2009, under the Uttar Pradesh Town Planning and Development Act, 1973. The directive followed a legal process that included hearings for the affected parties, ensuring due process was followed. However, for reasons that remain unclear, the order was not implemented at the time, allowing the unauthorised structures to remain intact for over a decade.

The issue resurfaced in 2012 when Lt Col Ashok Kumar filed a public interest litigation (PIL) highlighting the prevalence of unauthorised construction within the LDA's jurisdiction. The case brought renewed attention to violations within city limits, prompting judicial scrutiny of the LDA's inaction. After years of legal proceedings, the High Court recently ruled in favour of enforcing the original demolition order, reinforcing the need to uphold urban planning regulations.

Advocate Prince Lenin, representing Kumar, pointed out that with the High Court's strict directives, the concerned authorities were expected to take firm and immediate action against illegal constructions. He noted that the ruling signalled a zero-tolerance approach towards unauthorised developments and that the LDA now had a clear mandate to act decisively.

LDA Secretary Vivek Srivastava clarified that the notices issued serve as a final warning, giving apartment owners 15 days from the date of receipt to voluntarily dismantle the illegal portions of their buildings. If they fail to comply, the LDA will step in to carry out the demolition, with the cost being recovered as land revenue from the owners. This approach is intended to ensure accountability and discourage future violations of town planning regulations.

The LDA's move signals a stronger enforcement of building laws, reflecting a shift towards stricter urban planning governance. The crackdown on unauthorised structures, which have remained standing for years despite legal orders, underscores the challenges of regulating rapid urban expansion while maintaining compliance with zoning laws. If successfully executed, this action could serve as a precedent for similar interventions in other parts of the city, reinforcing the importance of adhering to approved building plans.

After years of delay, the crackdown on unauthorised constructions within LDA's limits is finally being enforced. With the High Court's directive pushing authorities to act decisively, property owners have little choice but to comply or face demolition. The move highlights the ongoing struggle to regulate urban development and the consequences of overlooking legal mandates. If successfully executed, this action could set a precedent for stricter enforcement against illegal structures in Lucknow.

Have something to say? Post your comment