SBI Term Loan: RLLR: 8.15 | 7.25% - 8.45%
Canara Bank: RLLR: 8 | 7.15% - 10%
ICICI Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.5% - 9.65%
Punjab & Sind Bank: RLLR: 7.3 | 7.3% - 10.7%
Bank of Baroda: RLLR: 7.9 | 7.2% - 8.95%
Federal Bank: RLLR: -- | 8.75% - 10%
IndusInd Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.5% - 9.75%
Bank of Maharashtra: RLLR: 8.05 | 7.1% - 9.15%
Yes Bank: RLLR: -- | 7.4% - 10.54%
Karur Vysya Bank: RLLR: 8.8 | 8.5% - 10.65%

Allahabad High Court orders probe into alleged fraud by housing society in Lucknow

#Law & Policy#India#Uttar Pradesh#Lucknow
Last Updated : 27th Dec, 2024
Synopsis

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Establishment to investigate alleged large-scale fraud involving the Himalayan Cooperative Housing Society Limited and the Lucknow Development Authority (LDA). The society is accused of illegally acquiring land exceeding the 12.5-acre limit and distributing plots after fraudulently claiming compensation, allegedly with the collusion of LDA staff. Justice Rajiv Singh ordered the vigilance department to submit a report by mid-January and take necessary action against those involved. This directive underscores the need for accountability, transparency, and stricter oversight in urban land transactions to prevent systemic lapses and fraudulent practices.

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Establishment to take swift action by registering a case, conducting a thorough investigation, and submitting a report regarding allegations of large-scale fraud involving the Himalayan Cooperative Housing Society Limited. The society stands accused of defrauding the Lucknow Development Authority (LDA) by illegally acquiring land exceeding the permissible limit of 12.5 acres and transferring portions of it to others. Allegations suggest that this was achieved with the active collusion of certain LDA staff members.


The court has instructed the vigilance department to present its findings by mid-January and to take necessary action against employees from both the housing society and the LDA who were allegedly involved in the fraudulent activities.

The directive was issued by Justice Rajiv Singh earlier this month in connection with a contempt petition filed by Sunanda Agarwal. While the court found no prima facie evidence to support a contempt case against the LDA officials, it noted serious irregularities that emerged during the hearing. Highlighting the importance of accountability, the court ordered a full-fledged vigilance inquiry.

During the proceedings, it was revealed that the Himalayan Cooperative Housing Society Limited had distributed plots to its members after unlawfully claiming compensation for nearly double the allowed land area. The disputed plots are located in the Gomtinagar Extension area. Furthermore, earlier investigations by government authorities and the LDA had already uncovered irregularities implicating both the society and certain LDA employees.

By initiating this investigation, the court aims to address the alleged misuse of power and ensure transparency in urban land dealings while holding all responsible parties accountable. This case highlights systemic lapses that need urgent correction.

The High Court?s intervention underscores the gravity of the alleged irregularities involving the Himalayan Cooperative Housing Society Limited and the Lucknow Development Authority. By directing a thorough vigilance inquiry, the court aims to bring clarity and accountability to the matter. This case also highlights the broader need for stricter oversight and transparency in land transactions and urban development activities to prevent such malpractices in the future.

Have something to say? Post your comment