The Bombay High Court has ordered a show-cause notice against the managing director of a construction company for allegedly misleading the court about financial commitments to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA). The developer claimed to have paid INR 6 crore in overdue rent, but it was revealed that two out of three cheques issued in 2022 had bounced. The case, brought by five tenants from Bharat Nagar, Bandra, highlights ongoing issues in slum redevelopment projects. The court's intervention underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in ensuring that developers honour their commitments to tenants.
The Bombay High Court has instructed that a show-cause notice be issued against the managing director of a construction company due to allegations of misleading statements regarding financial commitments to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA). The court's decision stems from claims that a substantial payment of INR 6 crore made by the developer towards overdue rent was misrepresented, as it was revealed that two out of three cheques issued in 2022 had bounced.
The case was brought to the court's attention by a group of five out of 133 eligible tenants from a former chawl located at Bharat Nagar in Bandra (East). The tenants' grievances date back to a redevelopment agreement signed in June 2004 between the Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Rahiwasi Seve Sangh and Satish Enterprises. Following the approval of this agreement, their homes were demolished in 2011, but the developer allegedly ceased payment of monthly transit rent starting in 2014, placing the tenants in a difficult financial position.
The tenants' advocates, Tanveer and Mariam Nizam, argue that despite several appeals, the SRA has failed to take action against the developer, leaving the tenants without the rent they are owed. The tenants claim that their situation has worsened due to the lack of transparency and response from the SRA regarding the payments that are supposedly being held for them.
During a court hearing, the developer's attorney, Shakeeb Ansari, asserted that the company had indeed deposited INR 6 crore with the SRA, suggesting that the authority was responsible for withholding these funds from the eligible tenants. However, SRA's spokesperson, Jagdish Reddy, countered this claim. He provided an affidavit indicating that the developer owed outstanding rent of INR 4.5 crore as of June 2022 and confirmed that the cheques sent for payment were dishonoured. Currently, the SRA states that the five petitioners collectively seek over INR 1.2 crore in rent arrears.
The judges, Justices Mahesh Sonak and Kamal Khata, expressed concern over the potential misrepresentation of facts in court and decided to take a firm stance by issuing a notice of contempt against the developer's managing director. This notice aims to clarify the circumstances surrounding the misleading statements made in the court. The legal team for the developer noted that the misleading claims were based on instructions from the company's in-house counsel, which raises questions about the accountability of senior management in these matters.
This case highlights the ongoing challenges faced by individuals in slum redevelopment projects, where promises of housing improvement often do not materialise into actionable benefits. The situation experienced by the petitioners is a reflection of broader concerns regarding the effectiveness of oversight by government bodies such as the SRA. With tenants still awaiting their rightful payments, the court's intervention underscores the importance of legal remedies in ensuring that such commitments are honoured.
As the case progresses, it remains crucial for the SRA to maintain transparency and uphold its responsibilities to the tenants. The ongoing legal discussions not only aim to provide justice for the affected individuals but also emphasise the need for better governance and accountability in slum redevelopment initiatives across Mumbai. The Bombay High Court's involvement could set a precedent for similar cases, encouraging other tenants facing similar delays or nonpayment issues to seek legal redress.
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
