The Makarba Town Planning (TP) Scheme 204 controversy is nearing resolution as a state-appointed committee - Ahmedabad recommends a 40% reduction in plot sizes for around 50 high-profile landowners. This move aims to address years of alleged irregularities in land use. The scheme, covering 1,100 hectares in sought-after zones like Sarkhej and Vejalpur, faced accusations of favoritism since 2007. A thorough investigation confirmed these claims, and the revised plan now awaits approval from the AMC and state government. The resolution could mark a shift toward greater accountability and transparency in Ahmedabad's urban planning.
The long-running controversy surrounding the Makarba Town Planning (TP) Scheme 204 is nearing resolution as a state-appointed committee - Ahmedabad has recommended significant changes. The committee suggests a 40% reduction in original plot sizes for around 50 high-profile landowners, aiming to address years of allegations regarding irregularities in land use and planning.
The Makarba TP scheme encompasses a vast area of approximately 1,100 hectares, including neighborhoods such as Sarkhej, Okaf, Vejalpur, and Ambli. Located strategically between significant roads like SG Highway and SP Ring Road, this area is one of the city's most sought-after residential and commercial zones. However, the scheme's reputation has been tarnished by claims of favoritism towards prominent individuals.
The controversy began in 2007 when the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (AUDA) allowed what is known as a "samjheuti karar," or memorandum of understanding, between plot owners. This agreement enabled owners of prime land to avoid mandatory land deductions by substituting cheaper plots in less desirable locations. As a result, many VVIP landowners benefited substantially, leading to substantial financial losses for the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC).
A thorough investigation by the committee, which was formed after widespread allegations of impropriety, supports these claims. The committee's proposal not only aims to implement the 40% deduction but also includes a provision that reserves the deducted land for residential purposes. Before this proposal can take effect, it needs approval from the AMC's town planning committee and the state government.
The issue gained traction in the Gujarat Legislative Assembly as the public demanded transparency in land transactions. Following a complaint from the former chief city planner, a town planning officer was suspended. This led to a suspension of all development permissions in the TP Scheme starting in 2017, allowing the committee to revisit and revise planning procedures.
Amid these reforms, the state government's urban development department has issued a letter instructing the AMC to strictly comply with guidelines established on September 13, 2022. According to these guidelines, development permissions can only be granted when a final plot has been established alongside the required 40% reduction.
As the revised plan awaits approval, there is growing concern among residents about the implications of the recommendations. While the proposed reductions aim to rectify past irregularities, many are questioning whether the changes will lead to genuine accountability and future compliance with planning laws. Local communities hope that this process will restore trust in the town planning system, ensuring equitable treatment for all landowners.
The Makarba case highlights broader issues of urban planning and governance in Ahmedabad. Many residents are keen to understand how the government will rectify earlier mistakes and prevent similar situations in the future. As the AMC prepares to take the next steps, there is a call for more stringent regulations and greater transparency in land dealings, particularly concerning high-profile individuals.
The resolution of the Makarba TP Scheme controversy could serve as a pivotal moment for urban planning in Ahmedabad, signaling a potential shift toward accountability and fairness in land use policies. Stakeholders from various sectors are now watching closely to ensure that the reforms proposed by the town planning committee lead to meaningful change rather than merely a temporary fix.
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
