In a recent ruling, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court addressed a key issue regarding eligibility under the state's slum policy. The court highlighted that those with commercial establishments in slum areas cannot be equated with traditional 'slum dwellers,' sparking debate. The case, focusing on the Akbarnagar demolition, saw the court directing authorities to provide details of slum dwellers filing GST and Income Tax returns. This underscores the court's intent to assess each case individually. The outcome of this legal battle will likely influence future urban development strategies and legal interpretations concerning slum rehabilitation policies.
In a recent ruling by the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court, a contentious issue came to light regarding the eligibility for benefits under the state government's slum policy. The court emphasised that those with commercial establishments in slum areas cannot be considered on par with traditional 'slum dwellers,' raising a debate over the application of the policy.
The case, centred around the Akbarnagar demolition, saw the bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and OP Shukla directing the state government, LDA, and the petitioners to provide details of slum dwellers who file GST and Income Tax returns. This move showed the court's intention to assess each case on its individual merits rather than applying a blanket policy.
Senior advocate JN Mathur, representing over 800 petitioners, argued strongly for compliance to the 2021 slum strategy, claiming that the state government could not break from its obligations. The debate over the legality of demolishing the area without a proper rehabilitation scheme heated up, with LDA counsel Ratnesh Chandra pointing out that some residents were offered the option of rehabilitation, which not all accepted.
The issue extends beyond legalities to questions of urban development and land usage. Akbarnagar, situated on government land along the banks of Kukrail, has seen the establishment of shops, commercial complexes, and multi-storied buildings over the years. While some argue for the enforcement of the rehabilitation scheme, others question the feasibility and implications of relocating established businesses and residences.
The ongoing legal battle has drawn attention to broader concerns, including the urgency of demolition drives, environmental impact, and the balance between development and displacement. Earlier interventions by the High Court, including stays on demolition drives and inquiries into residents' tenure, reflect the complexity of the issue.
Looking ahead, the scheduled hearing later this month will likely provide further insights into the court's stance and the government's response. The outcome will not only affect the fate of Akbarnagar but also set precedents for similar cases across the state.
As the legal saga continues, stakeholders, including residents, businesses, and authorities, face a critical juncture where the balance between policy enforcement and community welfare hangs in the balance. The resolution of the Akbarnagar case could potentially shape future urban development strategies and legal interpretations concerning slum rehabilitation policies.
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
