In Mudaliarkuppam, along Chennai's East Coast Road, unauthorized sea-view villas and apartments have sparked environmental concerns. Following a complaint by Thazuthali kuppam villagers, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) is investigating these constructions which allegedly lack mandatory clearances. State officials confirm some buildings violated planning permissions, while environmentalists warn of potential ecological impacts on local fisheries and erosion patterns. The issue, involving private properties, a church, and a school in restricted zones, highlights the need for stringent adherence to environmental regulations in sensitive coastal areas. The NGT is set to revisit the case next month.
In a startling revelation, the scenic coastal area of Mudaliarkuppam, along Chennai's East Coast Road, has become the centre of an environmental controversy. A series of new sea-view villas and apartments, reportedly constructed without the required environmental clearances, are drawing scrutiny from local residents and environmentalists alike. This issue came to light following a complaint lodged by residents of Thazuthali kuppam, a nearby village, with the National Green Tribunal (NGT). They demanded action against what they termed as 'illegal' constructions in the villages of Paramankeni and Mudaliarkuppam. These constructions include private villas, resorts, religious buildings, and certain developments by the Tamil Nadu Tourism Development Corporation (TTDC). Responding to the outcry, the NGT instructed the state environment department and Chengalpet Collector to conduct a thorough inspection and submit a detailed report. Rahul Nath, the Chengalpet Collector, acknowledged that some of the constructions in Paramankeni lacked the necessary planning permissions. He clarified that the TTDC had not erected any buildings, but had only installed a few umbrellas in the area. V K Saravanan, a range officer with the environment department, highlighted a more concerning aspect of the situation. He reported that none of the structures within the designated no-development zones in Paramankeni had received the mandatory Coastal Regulatory Zone (CRZ) clearance. Alarmingly, some buildings are situated as close as 10 meters from the shoreline. Saravanan pointed out that in certain cases, construction began after merely paying a panchayat approval fee, without waiting for a formal review of the applications. Environmental experts warn that these unauthorized constructions could significantly disrupt local ecology. The proximity of buildings to the coastline might not only alter erosion patterns but could also impact vital fish spawning grounds. This, in turn, has the potential to adversely affect the livelihoods of local fishing communities. The issue extends beyond private properties. A church and a school have also been erected in CRZ-III zones, where ideally no development should occur. Some property owners have obtained patta (land records) from the local revenue office. As the NGT prepares to re-examine the case next month, the situation in Mudaliarkuppam serves as a key reminder of the delicate balance between development and environmental preservation. The unfolding events underscore the importance of adhering to environmental regulations, especially in ecologically sensitive areas, to safeguard the well-being of local communities and preserve the natural beauty of the region for future generations.