India >> Maharashtra >> Thane >> Kopari

Kopri crematorium renovation sparks community protest and concerns

Synopsis

Residents of Kopri, Thane East, are vehemently opposing the construction of a three-story building at a crematorium, claiming it encroaches on the space used for children's final rites. Despite authorities insisting on renovation, the residents, demanding control be handed over to Thane Municipal Corporation, cite inadequate facilities on the grounds. Allegedly, a previous attempt at constructing a prayer hall halted in 2013 due to protests. Concerns include security lapses, with instances of guards being drunk and dogs interfering. TMC asserts the ongoing work aims to enhance cremation efficiency with additional pyres, not build a hall.

10 sec backward button
play pause button
10 sec forward button
0:00
0:00

In Thane East's Kopri locality, residents are vehemently opposing the construction of a three-story building at a crematorium, alleging that the designated area for children's final rites is being encroached upon. Authorities assert the construction is part of a renovation project for the cremation ground, backed by a budget of over Rs 212 crore from the Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC). Currently managed by the Kopri Dharmaday Trust, residents demand TMC take control. The 1,400-square-meter land, originally donated for a cremation ground, lacks basic amenities, according to residents.

The TMC's allocated budget for the project exceeds Rs 12 crore. Residents claim the construction of the complex began in 2013, initially intended as a prayer hall. However, relentless protests led to an abrupt halt in the construction. Security lapses, including guards being intoxicated, and incidents of dogs interfering with the cremation process, have intensified residents' concerns. The lack of facilities, such as benches, drinking water, and unclean washrooms, adds to their discontent.

Chandrashekhar Pawar, a resident, insists on adding a boundary wall and implementing a registry to verify bodies before cremation. He highlights instances where late arrivals were turned away by volunteers. Earlier, the crematorium was utilized for Satsang on Sunday evenings, resulting in the facility being closed for the entire day.

A Trust member claimed they are not involved in the construction work, which was confirmed by a TMC official. Namrata Pamnani, an ex-corporator of Kopri, emphasizes that only the renovation of the cremation ground is under consideration. She mentions that the proposed hall could aid relatives in completing pending last rites. However, considering the citizens' dissatisfaction, the possibility of relocating the construction elsewhere is being contemplated.

Commissioner of TMC, Abhijit Bangar, assured residents that their grievances have been acknowledged. He clarifies that no hall is being built, and the ongoing work is related to the crematorium, focusing on the construction of four additional pyres to enhance efficiency.

The Kopri residents' protest reflects broader concerns about the management, transparency, and suitability of infrastructure projects, especially those related to sensitive areas such as crematoriums. The clash between authorities' claims of renovation and residents' allegations of unwanted construction emphasizes the need for effective communication, community engagement, and adherence to residents' concerns in urban development initiatives.

As the situation unfolds, a collaborative approach involving residents, local authorities, and other stakeholders is crucial to finding a resolution that aligns with both the developmental goals and the well-being of the community. Additionally, it underscores the importance of comprehensive planning, addressing security concerns, and ensuring that projects meet the expectations and needs of the residents they are meant to serve.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the Kopri crematorium highlights the complexities associated with urban development projects and the necessity for inclusive and transparent decision-making processes. As the authorities navigate these challenges, residents' voices must be heard, and solutions should prioritize both developmental objectives and community satisfaction.

Have something to say? Post your comment

Recent Messages

Advertisement