The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) is facing widespread resistance to its proposed open space adoption policy, with nearly 75 objections and suggestions from political parties, activists, and citizens. The policy, which excludes parks and gardens, has drawn criticism for being a rehashed version of old ideas. Concerns arise over the 51 privately controlled plots, with allegations of commercial exploitation, even by politicians. A contentious clause in the policy suggests BMC would compensate 'caretakers' 50% of the cost of constructions on these plots, a move fervently opposed by activists who argue the illogicality of paying for public land. Activists assert BMC's responsibility in preserving essential open spaces for Mumbai's citizens.
The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has been met with significant opposition regarding its newly proposed open space adoption policy. Approximately 75 objections and suggestions have been raised, with a unanimous call from political parties, activists, and citizens for the policy to be discarded.
The policy, which was open for feedback until Tuesday, proposes the adoption of recreation grounds and playgrounds, albeit with certain conditions. Notably, parks and gardens are excluded from this policy, as the BMC intends to maintain them directly.
The term 'caretaker', which had previously stirred controversy, was removed from the recent draft. However, activists have criticized the new policy, labelling it as a mere repackaging of old ideas. They highlight that the policy fails to address the 51 plots currently under private control, suggesting that it may even encourage third-party interests. Alarmingly, 11 of these plots are reportedly under the control of politicians who have been accused of commercial exploitation, including the construction of clubs on these lands, thereby restricting public access.
A contentious clause in the draft policy states that the BMC will assume control of these plots by determining the capital value of any constructions and amenities on them. The BMC would then compensate the 'caretakers' 50% of the invested cost after depreciation. Activists have vehemently opposed this clause, arguing that it is illogical for the BMC to pay for its own land.
Prominent activists, have been at the forefront of the fight to preserve open spaces. They collectively believe that the BMC has the necessary authority, funds, and responsibility to protect these essential open spaces for the citizens of Mumbai.
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
