The recent Delhi High Court decision to grant time to the Centre for filing a reply on the plea seeking the linking of property documents with citizens' Aadhaar numbers has sparked a debate on the potential impact of such a move. The petitioner, Ashwini Upadhyay, a lawyer by profession, argues that linking property with Aadhaar will help curb corruption, black money generation, and "benami" transactions. The petitioner believes that such a measure will send a strong message that the government is committed to fighting corruption and black money. One of the main arguments put forth by the petitioner is that linking property with Aadhaar will lead to a 2% increment in annual growth. This claim implies that by streamlining property ownership and transactions through Aadhaar, the government can promote economic growth and eliminate inefficiencies in the real estate sector. However, this projection may require further empirical evidence to demonstrate its validity, as economic growth is influenced by a multitude of factors, and attributing it solely to the Aadhaar linkage might be oversimplifying the issue. Another significant point raised in the petition is that linking property with Aadhaar will help clean up the electoral process dominated by black money and benami transactions. The petitioner contends that political figures use their influence to amass private wealth, which undermines the trust citizens place in their elected representatives. While there have been instances of corruption and unaccounted wealth in politics, it is essential to consider the broader context and systemic reforms required to address such issues. Simply linking property with Aadhaar may not be a comprehensive solution, and additional measures targeting electoral reforms and transparency in political funding may also be necessary. The petitioner further claims that "benami" transactions in high-denomination currency facilitate illegal activities such as terrorism, naxalism, gambling, and money laundering. By linking property with Aadhaar, the argument goes, these illegal activities can be curbed to a great extent. However, it's crucial to acknowledge that "benami" transactions are just one aspect of the problem, and criminal activities are influenced by a myriad of other factors, including law enforcement capabilities, international cooperation, and addressing the root causes of such activities. In contrast to the petitioner's stance, some experts and activists have raised concerns about potential privacy and data security issues associated with linking property with Aadhaar. They argue that such a move could expose citizens to identity theft, property-related fraud, and misuse of personal information. For example, if property documents and Aadhaar numbers are linked, any data breach or unauthorized access to the database could have severe consequences, leaving individuals vulnerable to financial and social exploitation. To address these concerns, stringent data protection measures, robust cybersecurity protocols, and clear legal safeguards must be in place. Another counter viewpoint is that making Aadhaar mandatory for property ownership may pose challenges for vulnerable and marginalized communities who might face difficulties in obtaining an Aadhaar card due to various reasons, such as lack of documentation or limited access to government services. This could inadvertently create barriers to property ownership for these populations, further exacerbating socio-economic disparities. To mitigate this, the government would need to ensure that alternative identification options are available for those who cannot obtain Aadhaar cards. While the petitioner's arguments highlight potential benefits of linking property with Aadhaar, it is essential to consider the broader implications and potential drawbacks associated with such a move. To strike a balance between curbing corruption and safeguarding citizens' rights, a well-thought-out and holistic approach that includes data security measures, legal safeguards, and sensitivity towards marginalized communities should be adopted. Only then can such a policy effectively contribute to the fight against corruption and black money generation while upholding citizens' rights and privacy.