The tenancy certificate introduced by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) has seen limited uptake among wada residents. Only around 400 tenants have applied, with concerns about its utility, legal value, and potential loss of rights deterring others. The PMC is exploring alternatives like offering additional floor space index for wada redevelopment. Legal experts suggest that the significance of the certificates depends on their allocation. The low adoption reflects scepticism and fear among tenants. Efforts are being made to address concerns and protect residents' rights. The PMC aims to strike a balance between property owners and tenants' interests.
The tenancy certificate introduced by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) has not garnered significant interest among residents living in wadas, traditional residential buildings in the city. Only approximately 400 tenants residing in wadas have chosen to obtain the certificate, while doubts regarding its usefulness, legal validity, and concerns about potential loss of rights upon vacating the dilapidated wadas have dissuaded many from applying. PMC officials estimate that approximately 800 tenants have refrained from opting for the certificate due to these reservations.
Around seven years ago, the PMC initiated the issuance of these certificates to tenants in an effort to resolve legal disputes between property owners and occupants. A considerable number of tenants had chosen not to vacate the wadas, even when they were declared unsafe, out of fear of relinquishing their perceived "rights" over these properties.
In response to the limited uptake of the tenancy certificate, the civic administration is currently exploring alternative solutions. One potential option being considered is providing additional floor space index (FSI) for the redevelopment of the wadas. This approach would allow for the inclusion of tenants as owners in the event that the wada is scheduled for immediate redevelopment. However, if redevelopment is not imminent, the tenancy certificate would serve as a means to safeguard tenancy rights, according to Pravin Shende, a senior official from the PMC's building permission department.
Legal experts emphasize that the significance of these certificates lies in the underlying basis and circumstances surrounding their allocation. The manner in which the certificates have been issued and their specific terms will play a crucial role in determining their importance and impact on tenants' rights.
It is evident that the introduction of the tenancy certificate by the PMC was aimed at resolving long-standing legal battles and providing clarity to both property owners and tenants. However, the low uptake suggests that residents remain sceptical about the utility and potential consequences associated with possessing the certificate. The fear of losing their rights, particularly in the absence of immediate plans for redevelopment, appears to be a major deterrent for tenants.
Efforts are being made to address these concerns and explore alternative avenues to protect the rights of wada residents. By considering options such as providing additional FSI for redevelopment, the PMC aims to offer viable alternatives that can alleviate the apprehensions surrounding the tenancy certificate. As discussions and evaluations continue, it remains to be seen how the PMC will strike a balance between the interests of property owners and the rights of tenants, ensuring a fair and transparent process for all parties involved.