The Supreme Court has empowered the board of directors managing Unitech Ltd, allowing them to seek police assistance against disruptions on the company's properties. This decision supports the board's efforts to address the ongoing issues of over 12,000 homebuyers impacted by the firm's struggles. Initially intervening in January 2020, the court granted the Union Ministry of Corporate Affairs management control of Unitech, appointing retired IAS officer Yudvir Singh Malik to lead recovery efforts. The court's recent ruling enables the board to approach authorities for support, shield them from legal actions, and facilitate commercial decisions to generate revenue. Unitech's situation underscores broader challenges in India's real estate sector, emphasising the need for improved accountability and transparency.
The Supreme Court has taken a significant step to support the board of directors appointed to manage Unitech Ltd, a major real estate company facing numerous challenges. On Tuesday, the court allowed this board to seek police assistance if they encounter any disruptions caused by third parties on the company's properties. This move aims to help the board fulfil its responsibilities as it works to resolve ongoing issues for over 12,000 homebuyers left in limbo by the firm's struggles.
The Supreme Court initially intervened in January 2020, granting the Union Ministry of Corporate Affairs "total management control" of Unitech Ltd due to the company's inability to repay aggrieved homebuyers. Yudvir Singh Malik, a retired IAS officer, was appointed as the chairman and managing director to lead the recovery efforts. The court has emphasised that a professional board is essential to resume and complete construction projects, relieving the stress faced by homeowners who have invested in properties that remain unfinished.
In last week's ruling, Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, took note of the board's request for police support to navigate external interference that hampers their ability to manage the company effectively. The court clarified that the board could also approach government authorities to address any grievances they might have. The backing from the judiciary aims to empower the board to take decisive action in moving forward with Unitech's projects.
The Supreme Court has previously shielded the new board from legal actions against them during their tenure, allowing them to make necessary commercial decisions in line with homebuyers' interests. This includes raising funds owed by homebuyers and selling unsold properties to generate needed revenue. Furthermore, the board has been allowed to monetise unencumbered assets, which is crucial for completing pending housing units.
The situation surrounding Unitech Ltd dates back several years, with various court Orders drawing attention to the mismanagement of funds. The National Company Law Tribunal was previously petitioned to suspend the existing directors, and a forensic audit was initiated to investigate financial discrepancies. This audit, led by Grant Thornton India, revealed that Unitech had received approximately INR 14,270 crore from nearly 30,000 homebuyers between 2006 and 2014 and INR 1,805 crore from lenders for 74 projects. Alarmingly, about INR 5,063 crore of homebuyers' funds and INR 763 crore from financial institutions were reportedly not used for their intended purpose, leading to allegations of misconduct.
In light of these findings, the court has ordered a detailed investigation into the firm's promoters under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. As courts and authorities continue to scrutinise the operations of Unitech Ltd, stakeholders remain hopeful that this new management structure will bring about positive changes and much-needed progress. Many homebuyers are eager for reassurance that their investments will lead to completed homes and not further delays.
The situation at Unitech Ltd is reflective of wider challenges in the Indian real estate sector, where project delays and financial mismanagement have left countless buyers at risk. As regulatory bodies and the judiciary take a more active role in overseeing corporate governance, the case of Unitech Ltd stands as a crucial landmark in the movement towards greater accountability and transparency in the industry.
Advertisement
Facebook
Whatsapp
